For the past few weeks, I’ve been flirting with the notion of
vegetarianism. The reasons for this are varied, strangely arbitrary and have
nothing to do with animal rights (when did they write a Constitution?), the
environment, health, religion or any other misplaced conviction. In fact, the
reasons are so random, insignificant and seemingly unrelated that even I don’t
know how they combined to cause such a radical (for me) decision. I suppose it
didn’t hurt that I have lived with vegetarians for much of my adult life, but I
can’t say that figured into my decision any more than reading a book about WWII
spies* did. Suffice it to say, the drip-drip-drip of life events finally
converged into a rippling wave that slowly pushed me toward the Island of
Alternative Eating and left me stranded on its shore.
My plan is to become what I like to call a Hypocritical Vegetarian (a
Hypocritarian?), which means I will only eat animals that A) are too tasty to
ignore, and B) suffer the misfortune of not having a suitable meat substitute
available. Fish are especially lacking in this area. There is no substitute for
tuna in a tuna-fish sandwich, nor do breaded tofu sticks measure up in any
meaningful way to what Capt’n Birds Eye serves up. Also, I have yet to find a
plant-based turkey, so I’m afraid Tom-turkey will be visiting my dining table
this Thanksgiving, along with a bit of Percy-pig in the stuffing.
That's not food, that's what food eats. |
But I’m comfortable with that. Vegetarianism isn’t something you can
nail down. You don’t pound a stake into the ground, point to it and say, “This
is where vegetarianism lives.” Vegetarianism is a continuum, and anyone further
along that continuum is free to look over their shoulder and call anyone behind
them a hypocrite. I think that’s a waste of time, because while they are doing
that, the people further along the continuum are looking over their shoulders
and calling them hypocrites.
For the record, my wife is the only person I know—and I hasten to add
there are certainly many more, I just don’t know them—who is a non-hypocritical
vegetarian. This is because, unlike many vegetarians, she doesn’t avoid meat
for any social, spiritual or metaphysical reason, she just doesn’t like meat.
So, to be pedantic, she’s not really a vegetarian; she’s just a picky eater.
I, on the other hand, am quite fond of meat, but I am willing to give it
up, to a degree, based on a collage of esoteric reasons that I don’t pretend to understand. It’s been an interesting journey so far, a time of trial and error
and surprising discoveries — some good, some not so good. (Have you ever tried
vegan pepperoni? Don’t.) But overall, I was pleased, especially with the idea
that I had invented my own, personal style of vegetarianism, until I discovered
that I hadn’t.
Apparently, what I am doing is so popular, it has its own name —
Flexitarian — which is defined as “people who eat a plant-based diet with the
occasional inclusion of meat.” (Or, to put it another way, people who aren’t
vegetarians.)
Flexitarianism is not new, it is merely experiencing an inconvenient
resurgence in popularity; otherwise, I would have remained happily ignorant of
it. In 2003, the American Dialect Society voted Flexitarian as the year’s most
useful word. Had I known this a few weeks ago, I would never have considered
putting a toe on the vegetarian continuum; I hate the idea that I jumped on a
bandwagon. I wanted to be a lone, hypocritical voice, crying in the vegewilderness.
Instead, I’m just another guy pretending to be a vegetarian while the people
ahead of us on the continuum look over their shoulders and scowl. It’s
disappointing to discover that I have to share the scorn.
I remain pleasantly surprised, however, to find there are people on the
continuum who are behind me. People I could scowl over my shoulder at, if I was
of that ilk. Apparently, you can just give up steak and call yourself a
Pollo-pescetarian. And if you give up chicken in the bargain, you become a
Pescetarian, which is sorta where I am, with occasional forays into
Pollo-territory. Then there are vegetarians who don’t consume dairy products,
who can scowl at us all, and those who eschew eggs, who can scowl at them. Now
you are getting into Vegan territory, but that is no more nailed down than
vegetarianism is. Do you eat honey? What about plants that are sustained by
slave-bees, who are trucked to orchards and fields and forced to pollinate,
then rounded up and trucked to another location. So Veganitis is as woolly a
condition as Pollo-Pesce-eggavoidance is.
Incidentally, the way to determine if someone is a vegetarian or a vegan
is this: You can have a conversation with a vegetarian, even go for a meal with
them. You’ll have a lovely chat and part never knowing they are a vegetarian.
But if you meet a vegan, you can’t spend 15 second with them without them
telling you about it. You might think their lifestyle a little odd, but trust
me, they are simply the lid on an economy-sized package of nut-burgers.
Beyond vegans are fruitarians, who only eat fruit (not sustained by
slave-bees, I assume). And beyond them are Breatharians, who believe you can
survive on sunlight and water alone. Even Breatharians are divided into camps,
where one group believes you don’t need the water, just the sunlight. The way
to tell these two apart is: the non-water ones die within a few days, the water
and sunlight ones can last weeks.
No, it's you |
Obviously, I have no intention of exploring those extremes of the
continuum, I’m comfortable back here, near the beginning (but not at the
beginning) and unperturbed about being labeled a hyprcitarian.
Just don’t call me a Flexitarian.
____________________________________________________
* In this book, which was an account
of a true story, a young man joined the Nazis for the purpose of spying on them
and manages to tap into a very valuable stream of information. His girlfriend,
who is helping him, gets mistaken for a Nazi sympathizer by Partisans and the
young man has to stand by and watch her get put up against a wall and shot
because, if he tried to intervene, he would have given himself away, wherein he
would have found himself up against the wall, and the information necessary for
the Allied war effort would stop. Nothing whatsoever to do with vegetarianism,
but it provided one of the many threads that formed the rope that pulled me
toward it.
What was the book? It sounds worth a read.
ReplyDeleteThe Book is, Under a Crimson Sky by Mark Sullivan. The story about the book is interesting, as well. And the book is okay. It should have been much more exciting, but it dragged and I found myself skimming a lot. Sorry that I gave away one of the biggest surprises in the book ;)
DeleteOh, I think that might be on my Amazon wish list. Oh well, I needn't bother if it drags! I'm not very patient with books that aren't gripping.
ReplyDeleteThen let me recommend First Light, by Geoffrey Wellum. First hand, diary account of an 18 year-old you fought through the Battle of Britain as a Spitfire Pilot. Totally gripping stuff.
DeleteThanks, I've put that one on my Amazon wish list.
ReplyDelete